Robbins v. Robbins

HILL, Judge.

Five questions are raised by the appellant in his brief. All arose out of the findings of fact or the conclusions reached by the court from such findings.

Appellant contends the court erred in concluding that the plaintiff had abandoned the defendant; that such a conclusion is not supported by the findings of fact by the court or the evidence.

Abandonment within the meaning of the statute occurs when one spouse brings cohabitation to an end without justification, without consent, and without any intent of renewing such cohabitation. Panhorst v. Panhorst, 277 N.C. 664, 178 S.E. 2d…