Legal Opinion
Hammersley v. District Court in and for County of Routt
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 21, 1980No. 79SA568PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
In this original proceeding we issued a rule to show cause why an order of the Routt County District Court releasing a notice of lis pendens should not be vacated. We now make that rule absolute.
Petitioners are owners of a lot in a subdivision in Steamboat Springs. O’Donnell is the owner of an adjacent lot in that subdivision. The entire subdivision is subject to protective covenants recorded in the Routt County real estate records. The covenants impose certain criteria with respect to improvements to be constructed; create an architectural control committee to determine adherence to such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buckhorn Plaster Co. v. Consolidated Plaster Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Shuck v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Clopine v. KemperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Cheever v. MintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Empire Land & Canal Co. v. EngleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
3Cited by27 opinions
- Vail/Arrowhead, Inc. v. District Court for the Fifth Judicial District, Eagle CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- James H. Moore & Associates Realty, Inc. v. Arrowhead at Vail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Kerns v. KernsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Tucson Estates, Inc. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Olbrich v. TouchyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.