Clopine v. Kemper
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knauss
Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to as the Clopines and Hazel Kemper. Defendant in error, defendant in the trial court, will be referred to as defendant, or as Arthur Kemper.
The action was brought by the Clopines under Rule 105, R.C.P. Colo., to obtain an adjudication of the rights of all parties with respect to certain real estate, title to which the Clopines allegedly acquired by deed from Hazel Kemper. It was alleged in the complaint that on June 15, 1954, defendant filed a homestead entry with the county clerk and recorder of Sedgwick County,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shuck v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Central Savings Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Tinglof v. AskerlundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
3Cited by12 opinions
- James H. Moore & Associates Realty, Inc. v. Arrowhead at Vail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Hammersley v. District Court in and for County of RouttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Salstrom v. StarkeColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.