Legal Opinion
Vail/Arrowhead, Inc. v. District Court for the Fifth Judicial District, Eagle County
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 23, 1998No. 97SA188PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
The petitioner, Vail/Arrowhead, Inc. (“Vail”), brought this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21 seeking relief in the nature of mandamus from an order issued by the Eagle County District Court (“the district court”) denying Vail’s motion for summary judgment and permitting the plaintiff in the proceedings below, James H. Moore and James H. Moore & Associates Realty, Inc. (collectively, “Moore”), to reassert a claim for specific performance of property after Moore filed a disclaimer of any interest in the property under C.R.C.P. 105(f)(3). We issued a rule to show cause why the relief…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Fogg v. MacAlusoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Pittman v. Larson Distributing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- James H. Moore & Associates Realty, Inc. v. Arrowhead at Vail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Lombard v. Colorado Outdoor Education Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Pierson v. Black Canyon Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Martini v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.