Legal Opinion

Kerns v. Kerns

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 28, 2002No. 02SA59PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

In this original action, we issued a rule to show cause why the order of the District Court of Larimer County should not be vacated. The district court held that a party seeking to impose a constructive trust on real property located in Colorado is not entitled to file a notice of lis pendens under section 88-85-110, 10 C.R.S. (2001), because the action was brought in an out-of-state court without in rem jurisdiction over the property. Pursuant to the plain meaning of the statute, we hold that the procedure for filing a notice of lis pendens set forth in section 38-85-1110 is available to a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Westfield Development Co. v. Rifle Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Hewitt v. RiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. HAVILAH REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC v. VLK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Heck v. AdamsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Cain v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API