Kerns v. Kerns
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
In this original action, we issued a rule to show cause why the order of the District Court of Larimer County should not be vacated. The district court held that a party seeking to impose a constructive trust on real property located in Colorado is not entitled to file a notice of lis pendens under section 88-85-110, 10 C.R.S. (2001), because the action was brought in an out-of-state court without in rem jurisdiction over the property. Pursuant to the plain meaning of the statute, we hold that the procedure for filing a notice of lis pendens set forth in section 38-85-1110 is available to a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Westfield Development Co. v. Rifle Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Hewitt v. RiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- HAVILAH REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC v. VLK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Heck v. AdamsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cain v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.