Buckhorn Plaster Co. v. Consolidated Plaster Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Larimer District Court — Hon. James E. G-arrigues, Judge. .
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
The ultimate-question involved in these cases is the right of possession and control of a certain government subdivision of land, and a structure known as The Loveland Buckhorn Mill, and appurtenances, together with the land upon which the mill is situate. The Consolidated Plaster Company brought suit originally against Alfred Wild to quiet title to the property involved. The judgment was in favor of the defendant. The company brought the case to this court for review on error, where the judgment was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Upon filing the remittitur The Consolidated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hoffman v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Graves v. . BerdanNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Forest CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Denison v. JeromeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kroehnke v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Hammersley v. District Court in and for County of RouttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Co. v. McCloughanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Russell v. Golden Rule Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.