Legal Opinion
Edmisten v. Bull Shoals Landing
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 27, 2014No. CV-12-75PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice.
| Appellant Matthew Edmisten appeals from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming and adopting the opinion of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and denying his claim for benefits associated with an injury he received during his employment with appel-lee Bull Shoals Landing.1 On November 1, 2007, Edmisten and Greg Prock were injured at work while Edmisten was holding the lid of a fifty-five-gallon drum as Prock opened the drum with an acetylene torch; the drum exploded, severely burning both Edmisten and Prock. Edmisten and Prock were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Prock v. Bull Shoals Boat LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Pickens-Bond Construction Co. v. CaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prock v. Bull Shoals Boat LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Reed v. Turner IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Jamy L. Blair v. American Stitchco, Inc., and Bridgefield Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Jason Papageorge v. Tyson Shared Services, Inc., and Tynet CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.