Legal Opinion

Tuszynska v. Cunningham

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 2011No. E050858PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Danuta Tuszynska, an attorney, provided legal representation to members of defendant Riverside Sheriffs’ Association (RSA), under the auspices of defendant Riverside Sheriffs’ Association Legal Defense Trust (RSA-LDT), a prepaid legal services plan that provides legal representation and related services to RSA members. Plaintiff filed suit against the RSA-LDT, the RSA, and James Cunningham, a former administrator of the RSA-LDT, alleging that, because she is a woman, she received fewer case referrals from the RSA-LDT after Cunningham became its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.California Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Hunter v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People ex rel. Fire Insurance Exchange v. AnapolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API