Phil. B. Bekeart Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
EKwall, Judge:
Three packages of fishhooks were sent by parcel post from England to San Francisco, Calif., and were there made the subject of informal entries on customs Form 3419 (Art. 375, Customs Regulations of 1937). On each of such entries the “Value,” and “Rate,” and “Duty” columns are properly filled out, with no mention of the British purchase tax, nor any indication that the appraiser did other than accept the value set out in the entry. The entries were duly liquidated and within 60 days protests were filed against such liquidations. The protests are identical in terms and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheldon & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. General Electric Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Twenty-Eight Cases of WineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Heemsoth Kerner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Goldstein v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Universal Importing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Hirschman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.