Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Schaengold v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 2007No. 2006-1920PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”), to treat the service of an attorney employed as a temporary magistrate by a municipal court as that of a public employee entitled to PERS membership and credit. Because the retirement board did not abuse its discretion by determining that the attorney acted as an independent contractor rather than as a municipal court employee, we affirm.
{¶ 2} Appellant, Gary C. Schaengold, is an attorney licensed to practice law in Ohio since 1982. At times between 1986 and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel Pipoly v. State Teachers Retirement Sys.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Kinsey v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Van Dyke v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Northwestern Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Shisler v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.