Legal Opinion

State v. Pike

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1968No. 658PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s action in refusing to allow defendant to testify on voir dire hearing held on his motion to suppress evidence.

One of the most strictly defined principles in our system of jurisprudence is that which separates the functions of the court from those of the jury. State v. Fogleman, 204 N.C. 401, 168 S.E. 536. It is the duty of the court to pass on the competency and admissibility of evidence. This includes the duty to pass upon the validity of a search warrant and the competency of evidence procured thereunder, when they are properly made the subject…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. State v. Andrew.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1867

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API