Degussa Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The United States Customs Service (Customs) classified Degussa Corporation’s (Degussa) surface-modified silicon dioxide products under Heading 3824 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), thereby making them subject to a five percent ad valorem tax. The United States Court of International Trade held that the subject products are properly classified under Heading 2811 of the HTSUS, which provides for “Silicon dioxide: Other” and are not subject to a duty tax. See Degussa Corp. v. United States, 452 F.Supp.2d 1310 (C.I.T.2006). The government…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- National Advanced Systems v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Motorola, Inc, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Rubie's Costume Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Degussa Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
3Cited by40 opinions
- Airflow Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Agfa Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Drygel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.