Legal Opinion
Marubeni America Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 7, 1994No. 93-1467PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
The United States (the government) appeals the May 14, 1993, judgment of the Court of International Trade (CIT), No. 90-04-00210, 821 F.Supp. 1521, holding that 1989 and 1990, two door, two-wheel and four-wheel drive, Nissan 1 Pathfinder (Pathfinder) vehicles are correctly classified under heading 8703.23.00 (8703) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) as motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
A The Merchandise
The merchandise at issue is a two door, two-wheel or four-wheel drive, dual-purpose or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- E.M. Chemicals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Puerto Rico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Totes, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.