Legal Opinion

Thiessen v. Weber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1929No. 28,802PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to forfeit and cancel an oil-and-gas lease for breach of the implied covenant reasonably to develop it. It was tried to the court, who made findings of fact and rendered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff was the owner of a quarter section of land in Sumner county. On March 10, 1923, he executed an oil-and-gas lease on this land to R. H. Stewart for a term of five years, and as long thereafter as oil or gas should be produced from the land. The lease contained a provision that if the lessor owned a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Lanyon Zinc Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Cochran v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Jeffers v. ForbesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Fischer v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Farrar v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  5. Hunt v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API