Hunt v. McWilliams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.
Counsel for appellee McWilliams state the substance of the jurisdictional problem in this controversy when they assert that because their client is sole owner of the forty acres he may sue for cancellation of an oil and gas lease; and this may be done without bringing into the litigation non-participating royalty holders whose aggregate interests were 98/113ths. The trial court held that the royalty owners were not indispensable parties, since their concern was with oil [and gas] as such, in contradistinction to operations or plans pertaining to production, or use…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mallow v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Sharpe v. Landowners Oil Assn.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. HowthTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Matthews v. Landowners Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Thiessen v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Worth v. CIV. SERVICE COM'N OF EL DORADOSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Slade v. GammillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Grimes v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Merritt v. RynoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- SEECO, Inc. v. SnowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.