Legal Opinion
Farrar v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided June 11, 2010No. 103,009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Greene, J.:
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, formally Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil), appeals the district court’s certification of a class action against it by Mobil’s oil and gas lessors of Kansas minerals within the Hugoton Field, or by the successors in interest to such lessors, alleging breach of express and implied covenants by Mobil in the purported improper deduction of expenses from the payment of royalties to lessors. Mobil contends the district court abused its discretion in certifying a class because it failed to rigorously analyze the requirements of K.S.A. 60-223, that choice-of-law…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Abraham v. WPX Production Productions, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Coulter v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Ross-Williams v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.