Long v. Tokai Bank of California
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Presiding Judge.
This matter is before the court on the appeal of plaintiffs/appellants from the summary judgment granted to Tokai Bank of California (“Tokai”). The undisputed facts pertinent to resolution of this case are as follows. Tokai is a banking corporation and is not in the business of commercial leasing. Tokai provides a number of banking services, including, on occasion, the purchase and lease of machinery and equipment. The purpose of the lease agreements is to provide a method of financing so that customers can facilitate their acquisition of equipment. Accordingly, on May…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Doner v. SnappOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Nath v. National Equipment Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Green v. LemarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hollar v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Butler County Board of Commissioners v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Jones v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
- Stiner v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.