Legal Opinion

Long v. Tokai Bank of California

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1996No. 15748PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Presiding Judge.

This matter is before the court on the appeal of plaintiffs/appellants from the summary judgment granted to Tokai Bank of California (“Tokai”). The undisputed facts pertinent to resolution of this case are as follows. Tokai is a banking corporation and is not in the business of commercial leasing. Tokai provides a number of banking services, including, on occasion, the purchase and lease of machinery and equipment. The purpose of the lease agreements is to provide a method of financing so that customers can facilitate their acquisition of equipment. Accordingly, on May…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Doner v. SnappOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Nath v. National Equipment Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Green v. LemarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Hollar v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  3. Butler County Board of Commissioners v. City of HamiltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Jones v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. Stiner v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API