Legal Opinion

Stilwell v. Henry C. Merriam Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1923No. 17969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action, against Henry C. Merriam Company, a corporation, is to recover a balance of $1,628.10, and an attorney’s fee due on a sixty-day promissory note of $5,000, dated March 26, 1920, payable to the plaintiff, signed “Henry C. Merriam Company by Charles B. Merriam, authorized agent.” The defense was that the note was made without authority to bind Henry C. Merriam Company, and that whatever sums were paid to the plaintiff on account of the note were paid without the knowledge or consent of the corporation. Findings of fact, conclusions and judgment were entered for the defendant, from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McKinley v. Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kirwin v. Washington Match Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Twisp Mining & Smelting Co. v. Chelan Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Chapman v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re Super Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Mercy v. A. I. Hall & Son, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Drew-Warren Radio Electric Co. v. Western Loan & Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API