McKinley v. Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Poindexter, J., entered June 18, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
This is. a suit to recover -upon a promissory note. The complaint avers that the defendant, a corporation, being indebted to the plaintiff, made and delivered to the plaintiff its promissory note for the sum of $2,500. *163The copy of the note which appears in the complaint states that the note was given for value received, and the signature thereof is as follows: “Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co., by Arthur A. Dunphy, Pres.” The usual averments as to ownership and nonpayment of the note are made, and judgment is demanded for the full principal sum, with interest and attorney’s fees. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Wallace Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Allen v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- Carrigan v. Port Crescent Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Malone v. Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Saunders v. United States Marble Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- W. E. Moses Land Scrip & Realty Co. v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- McCoy v. PastoriusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Twisp Mining & Smelting Co. v. Chelan Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Engler v. Ipswich Printing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.