Legal Opinion

Mercy v. A. I. Hall & Son, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1934No. 24985. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was based upon a written guaranty. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence, a motion to dismiss was presented and sustained as to the defendants George Shrive and wife. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,370. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for new trial were interposed, both of which were overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendant A. I. Hall & Son, Inc., appeal.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woods Lumber Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Spencer v. Alki Point Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. McKinley v. Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Keyes v. Citizens State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Goodwin v. Stimson Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Exeter Co. v. Samuel Martin, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Millett v. MacKie Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. A. M. Castle & Co. v. Public Service UnderwritersWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Graves v. Cascade Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Ekstrom v. D. Dierssen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API