Legal Opinion

Kirwin v. Washington Match Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1905No. 5158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered December 18, 1903, after a hearing on the merits before the court without a jury, appointing a receiver during the pendency of the action.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

The statement of facts in this ease was stricken at the hearing. The only question now remaining in the case for our consideration is the sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action. The complaint alleges, in substance, that on the 3d day of April, 1903, plaintiffs entered into a contract with certain agents acting for and on behalf of The Washington Match Company, a corporation, by the terms of which contract plaintiffs agreed to advance to said company $15,000, for which certain security was to be given; that, under said contract, plaintiffs furnished to said company the sum of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Pitcher v. Lone Pine-Surprise Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McKinley v. Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Twisp Mining & Smelting Co. v. Chelan Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Stilwell v. Henry C. Merriam Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API