Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1871No. 2,502PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Wallace, J.:

It appears by the petition here, praying a writ of mandamus against the Board of Supervisors, that Creighton, in April, 1861, entered into certain contracts, in writing, with the Superintendent of Public Streets and Highways of the City and County of San Francisco, for the time being, to grade Union street, from Taylor to Larkin, and to grade the crossing of Union and Jones streets, according to specifications, in the usual form in which such contracts were accustomed to be made, under the provisions of the statute in that behalf; and thereafter, in due time and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Blanding v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Creighton v. MansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McSurely v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Steele County v. ErskineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API