Legal Opinion

United States v. Milton Zucker Mende

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1995No. 93-50586PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Milton Mende appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy, multiple counts of mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. Mende alleges that the district court erred in three ways: failing to grant his motion for mistrial based on improper prose-cutorial comments on his exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination; admitting evidence of his prior fraudulent conduct; and calculating his base offense level. We AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

From 1984 until 1990, Mende and his co-conspirators, Robert Turman and Samuel Longo, organized…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Carlo Scott BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. McLellan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. Ralph Pena-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Lewis Tam, AKA Yiu Kwong Tam, United States of America v. Robert Ng, United States of America v. Co GiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Tavares v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API