Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlo Scott Bagley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 1985No. 84-3063PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Carlo Scott Bagley was convicted after a jury trial of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He appeals his conviction and urges reversal on the basis of several alleged errors in the pretrial proceedings and in the trial itself. We reject his contentions and affirm his conviction.

FACTS

On October 31, 1983, at approximately 12:45 p.m., the Peninsula Branch of the First Interstate Bank of Oregon was robbed by a lone black male who was wearing a cap, reddish-pink sunglasses, and a dark jacket. The robber obtained $500 in cash from a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API