Tavares v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
SUMMARY
In this case, we consider whether the failure to instruct the jury on the limited purposes for which uncharged bad act evidence is admitted constitutes plain error. Under the circumstances presented here, we conclude that it does. Moreover, we conclude that, subject to the defendant’s objection, the prosecutor shall henceforth have the burden of requesting that a limiting instruction be given both at the time the prosecutor introduces the evidence and in the final charge to the jury. As a result, we will review future cases involving the failure to request a limiting instruction…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by77 opinions
- State v. RodriguezTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Valdez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- McLellan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Carter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.