Haynes v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
Two points for reversal are raised in this appeal from Andre Haynes’s conviction on charges of burglary, aggravated robbery, theft of property, and attempted rape. Despite the appellant’s attorney’s inadequate abstracting of the record, the State’s supplement is sufficient for us to consider the merits of the case. Finding no error in the proceedings below, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
In April 1992, the prosecuting attorney for the Tenth Judicial Circuit filed an information charging appellant Haynes with one count each of burglary, aggravated robbery,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Davasher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- State of Washington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Warnock v. WarnockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.