Legal Opinion

Wilkerson v. Wells Fargo Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1989No. B037184PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant H. William Wilkerson (Wilkerson) appeals from a judgment following a grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, defendant and respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. (Wells Fargo or the Bank).

The at-will provisions set forth in the Bank’s employee handbook and its service and operations manual (SOM) do not establish Wilkerson’s employment was at-will as a matter of law, in the face of contrary evidence that Bank policy was to terminate only for good cause.

The Bank’s alleged good faith belief it had good cause does not dispose of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Shapiro v. Wells Fargo Realty AdvisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Gerdlund v. Electronic Dispensers InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hedging Concepts, Inc. v. First Alliance Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Slivinsky v. Watkins-Johnson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API