Legal Opinion

Slivinsky v. Watkins-Johnson Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1990No. H005437PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COTTLE, J.

In this wrongful termination action, the trial court granted defendant employer’s motion for summary judgment as to all seven causes of action in plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff contends that material questions of fact exist as to four causes of action (breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, and invasion of privacy) and consequently the court erred in granting summary judgment. We conclude, as a matter of law, that plaintiff has failed to state any cause of action against her former employer because the parties’ written…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Flait v. North American Watch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Metoyer v. ChassmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API