Legal Opinion

Gerdlund v. Electronic Dispensers International

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1987No. Docket Nos. H000734, H001058PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

Plaintiffs Leroy Gerdlund and Susan Gerdlund filed suit against Electronic Dispensers International (EDI) claiming that EDI breached a written agreement by terminating them as sales representatives without good cause. Prior to trial EDI brought an in limine motion seeking to exclude evidence of oral representations made by EDI to the Gerdlunds that they would not be terminated as long as they performed well. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court denied EDI’s motion and the matter proceeded to trial. A jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Gerdlunds and awarded them…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Wallis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. William Rose, Jr. Orie Reed v. Wells Fargo & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & MarmaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API