Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
When an employee hired under an implied agreement not to be dismissed except for “good cause” is fired for misconduct and challenges the termination in court, what is the role of the jury in deciding whether misconduct occurred? Does it decide whether the acts that led to the decision to terminate happened? Or is its role to decide whether the employer had reasonable grounds for believing they happened and otherwise acted fairly? The Courts of Appeal are divided over the question. The majority of California decisions suggest the jury’s role is to decide whether the employer…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.