Legal Opinion

Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1998No. S057098PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

When an employee hired under an implied agreement not to be dismissed except for “good cause” is fired for misconduct and challenges the termination in court, what is the role of the jury in deciding whether misconduct occurred? Does it decide whether the acts that led to the decision to terminate happened? Or is its role to decide whether the employer had reasonable grounds for believing they happened and otherwise acted fairly? The Courts of Appeal are divided over the question. The majority of California decisions suggest the jury’s role is to decide whether the employer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API