Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad v. Miller
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Miami Circuit Court; Noti N. Antrim, Special Judge. Action by Matilda D. Miller against tbe Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, P. J.
Action for damages for'tbe destruction of means of ingress to and egress from appellee’s property.
Tbe first paragraph of complaint avers that appellee owns, and has owned for more than thirty years, in fee, certain land occupied and improved as a residence for herself and her family. Tbe land is described as “commencing at a point on the Wabash river, being the southwest corner of the corporation' of the town of Peru as said town was laid out and incorporated on the 21st day of January, 1876, running thence north on said corporation line to the Wabash & Erie canal, thence west along said *28Wabas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. EberleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- City of Logansport v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Mitchell v. BainIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Phœnix Insurance v. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. TrzopIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Leimgruber v. LeimgruberIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Terre Haute Brewing Co. v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Union Traction Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lake County Agricultural Society v. VerplankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.