Legal Opinion

Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. Trzop

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1920No. 23,804PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

— Appellee brought this action against appellant to recqver damages for personal injuries sustained while in the latter’s employment. The complaint was in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was grounded on the Employers’ Liability Act approved March 2, 1911, Acts 1911 p. 145, §8020a et seq. Burns 1914, and the second was drawn upon the theory of an action at common law. Appellant’s motion to make each paragraph of the complaint more specific, as well as its demurrer for want of facts addressed to each paragraph of the complaint, was overruled, whereupon it answered by a general denial. The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Knoefel v. AtkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Oliver v. CoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. Hemmer, Admx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Simmons v. Erie Insurance ExchangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Brown v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API