Legal Opinion
City of Logansport v. Dykeman
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1888No. 13,666PublishedCited by 46 opinions
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was a suit brought by David D. Dykeman and George C. Taber against the City of Logansport to recover the amount which, it is alleged, the city agreed to pay the plaintiffs for the services of the appellee Dyke-man in effecting a compromise and settlement of a large outstanding banded indebtedness against the city in the year 1885.
William T. Wilson, a partner in business with .the plaintiffs, was made a party defendant, to answer, it being alleged in the complaint that he had no interest in the claim against the city, he having assigned or surrendered his interest therein to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Steckert v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Bass Foundry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Gas-Light & Coke Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1879
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sluder v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Crooke v. LugarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hanly v. SimsIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.