Legal Opinion

Leimgruber v. Leimgruber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1908No. 21,130PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Prom Decatur Circuit Court; Marshall Hacker, Judge. Claim by William P. Leimgruber against William P. Leimgruber, as administrator of the estate of Mary M. Leimgruber, deceased. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

William P. Leimgruber, being the administrator of his wife’s estate (Mary M. Leimgruber, deceased), filed a personal claim against his decedent’s estate, for money had and received for the benefit of the claimant, for more than $12,000. Deeming the claim of sufficient importance, the court appointed Wickens & Osborn, reputable attorneys, to defend on behalf of the estate. There was no special an*372swer. The cause was submitted for trial, and upon request the court returned a special finding of facts and conclusions of law thereon. The finding was in favor of the claimant for $6,771.27. A motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of Stanley v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Maxwell v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Phœnix Insurance v. RoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Arnold v. EnglemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Harrell v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. The People v. HalkensIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Terre Haute, Etc., Traction Co. v. McDermottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Union Traction Co. v. City of MuncieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API