Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Electric Welding Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1958No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones,

The City of Pittsburgh, acting by its treasurer, appeals from the order of the court below sustaining the Electric Welding Company’s appeal from a mercantile license tax assessment, with penalties, on the ground that the company’s business operations constituted manufacturing and that, consequently, it was not liable for the tax.

By ordinance No. 488 of December 1, 1947, as amended, the city imposed an annual mercantile license tax on persons engaged in the occupation or business of vending or dealing in goods, wares and merchandise with thé proviso, however,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armour and Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. McCrady-rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. General Foods Corp. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. Berlo Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Philadelphia School District v. Parent Metal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Van Bennett Food Co. v. City of ReadingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API