Legal Opinion

Armour and Co. v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1949No. Appeals, 224 and 231 to 241PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Horace Stern,

The question is the extent to which certain meatpacking establishments in Allegheny County are subject to mercantile license taxes levied by the City of Pittsburgh and the School District of Pittsburgh for the year 1948.

The Act of June 25, 1947, P. L. 1145, gave authority to cities of the second class A and certain other political subdivisions to levy such taxes on persons, transactions, occupations, privileges, subjects and personal property within their limits as they should determine, but not on a privilege, transaction, subject, occupation or personal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Pittsburgh Milk Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. National Biscuit Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Sterling v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. General Foods Corp. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API