Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCrady-rodgers Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1934No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The court below held that the process of making concrete by placing measured amounts of dry materials into a mixer, revolving the dry mass until thoroughly mixed, and then, while it is in motion, adding a measured amount of water to bring the mixture to a plastic state, all for the purpose of selling as a commercial article, is manufacturing, and capital employed therein is exempt from taxation under the provisions in the Capital Stock Tax Acts. The Commonwealth appeals.

The taxing statute in force during the year, 1931, was the Act of June 1, 1889, P. L. 420, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. John T. Dyer Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Commonwealth v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. Welsh Mountain Mining & Kaolin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Deitch Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Connecticut Sand & Stone Corporation v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Rieck-McJunkin Dairy Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Pittsburgh v. Electric Welding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API