Legal Opinion

Nakao v. Rushen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1985No. 84-2232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

766 F.2d 410

Charles NAKAO and Helen Gabriel Nakao, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Ruth L. RUSHEN, Director, California Department of

Corrections, et al., Defendants,

J.P. Campbell, Individually and as Administrative Aid to the

Warden, San Quentin State Prison, San Quentin,

Ca., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 84-2232.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 13, 1985.

Decided July 18, 1985.

Nina Rivkind, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Dane R. Gillette, Dep. Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nakao v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
  3. Nakao v. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Nakao v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giba v. CookDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  2. (PC) Clark v. CiolliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PC) Escobar v. GaryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API