Legal Opinion

Nakao v. Rushen

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 6, 1982No. C-81-3816 SAWPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WEIGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action are Charles Nakao, a former inmate of San Quentin state prison (inmate Nakao), Helen Gabriel Nakao (Mrs. Nakao), and Ronald Dellums, a United States Congressman. Defendants, identified in detail below, are various officials and employees of the State of California (state defendants) and the County of Contra Costa (county defendants). One of plaintiffs’ claims is that the state defendants opened and copied certain letters sent by Congressman Dellums to inmate Nakao when Nakao was incarcerated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. William Trerice v. Dan A. Pedersen, Captain, U.S. Navy, Commanding Officer, Uss RangerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Nakao v. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Campbell v. SumnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
  4. Nakao v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
  5. Burt v. CarlsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API