Legal Opinion

Nakao v. Rushen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1985No. 84-2232PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

This is a section 1983 action brought by Charles Nakao, a prison inmate, and his wife, Helen Nakao, seeking damages for violation of their constitutional rights under the first, fourth, and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution for the seizure and dissemination of the Nak-aos’ personal correspondence. The action originally named state, county, and prison officials. The claims against all defendants except J.P. Campbell, a prison official at San Quentin State Prison, were dismissed at an earlier stage of the proceedings, either through settlement or rulings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nakao v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
  3. Nakao v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nakao v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
  2. Nakao v. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. (PC) Escobar v. GaryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PC) Harris v. BurnesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Martin v. CastilloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API