Legal Opinion
(PC) Clark v. Ciolli
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 6, 2022No. 1:21-cv-01081Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE DWAYNE CLARK, Case No. 1:21-cv-01081-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. TO DISMISS THE ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR 14 ANDREW CIOLLI, et al., RELIEF 15 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 16 17 Plaintiff Willie Dwayne Clark is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 action brought pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1331
and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of 19 Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). Currently before the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.