Legal Opinion

Williams v. Miranda

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1958No. Civ. 22477PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *

We are presented here with separate appeals by the plaintiff and cross-defendants upon the one hand, and by the defendant and cross-complainant on the other, from portions of a decree entered in an action wherein plaintiff sought partition of a parcel of real property.

On September 7, 1943, defendant Max Miranda and cross-defendant Mary Louise Miranda, now Mary Louise Brown, who will hereinafter be referred to as Mrs. Miranda, were husband and wife and the owners as joint tenants of the sub jeet property. On that date a divorce action between them being pending, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Miranda v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cahlan v. Bank of Lassen CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Reagh v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. In Re Will of MartellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Lewis v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Kravik v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Riley v. TurpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API