Legal Opinion

Miranda v. Miranda

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1947No. Civ. 15905PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

By this action appellant sued her former husband for partition of Lot 31, Block B of Sherman Subdivision, Los Angeles County. By his cross-complaint, respondent, Max A. Miranda, alleged that pending the action for divorce, on September 7, 1943, and prior to entry of the interlocutory decree the parties executed a writing whereby they settled all differences with respect to their property and the custody of their children; that the lot “was to be held in the names of said parties so long as the cross-defendant and the minor children . . . should occupy the premises as a home, and that if…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re Earl William Teichman, Debtor. Barbara F. Teichman, Cross-Appellant v. Earl William Teichman, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lois J. Newman (Formerly Lois J. Senderman) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Republic Pictures Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API