Legal Opinion

Menge v. Morris & Essex Railroad

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 20, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill for injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, Y. C.

(orally).

In- the case of August Mange, complainant, and the Morris and Essex Railroad Company et al.,' defendants, the conclusion I have reached is, that the motion for a preliminary injunction will be denied, upon condition that the railway company deposit forthwith, within a time to be named in the order, in the court of chancery, an amount of money to be fixed by the order, which will guarantee to the complainant the just compensation which he is entitled to receive for land which the railway company is now occupying and which it proposes to take permanently for its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. New Jersey Short Line RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Nelson v. New Jersey Short Line RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  3. Potter v. WomachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Vogts v. GuerretteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Vogts v. GuerretteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API