Potter v. Womach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Noble County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by D. C. Womach against Ollie Potter. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1ConcurrenceThacker, J.
The plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and the defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court. The plaintiff, upon the trial, in January, 1915, recovered a verdict and judgment against the defendant for $5,000 as damages for his loss and injury sustained as the result of illicit relations, including sexual intercourse, between the deiendant and the plaintiff’s wife during a period of nearly seven years, commencing on December 18, 1907, and ending on March 21, 1914, three days before this action was commenced. The plaintiff and the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Whiteside v. First Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1902
- Bigby v. DouglasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Broadway Manufacturing Co. v. Leavenworth Terminal Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NewburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.