Legal Opinion
Moore v. Olcott
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.
The sole question presented is whether the defendants can lawfully reject an application for a loan upon the ground that the applicant will use the money borrowed for purposes other than to acquire a farm or a home as provided, by Section 7, Chapter 201, Laws of 1921, which reads as follows:
“Any person fully qualified to receive either a loan or bonus hereunder shall have the option of electing to take either a cash bonus or to receive a farm or home loan, but no person shall be entitled to both a cash bonus and a farm or home loan.”
*271Section 1 of the act recites that:
“The State of Oregon, for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Menge v. Morris & Essex RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- School Dist. 1, Mult. Co. v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Beers v. Beers, AdministratrixOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Bell v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- School Dist. 1, Mult. Co. v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1955