Legal Opinion

Moore v. Olcott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

The sole question presented is whether the defendants can lawfully reject an application for a loan upon the ground that the applicant will use the money borrowed for purposes other than to acquire a farm or a home as provided, by Section 7, Chapter 201, Laws of 1921, which reads as follows:

“Any person fully qualified to receive either a loan or bonus hereunder shall have the option of electing to take either a cash bonus or to receive a farm or home loan, but no person shall be entitled to both a cash bonus and a farm or home loan.”

*271Section 1 of the act recites that:

“The State of Oregon, for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Menge v. Morris & Essex RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. School Dist. 1, Mult. Co. v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Beers v. Beers, AdministratrixOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Bell v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. School Dist. 1, Mult. Co. v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API