Legal Opinion

Nelson v. New Jersey Short Line Railroad

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 28, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion for 'a preliminary injunction. Heard on bill and affidavits and answering affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, Y. C.

After learning that an appeal had been taken in this case from the order advised by me denying the motion for an injunction on terms, it became my duty to set forth in writing the reasons for the order which I had advised. Before undertaking this work, a motion for a preliminary injunction to restrain a railroad company from appropriating land before making compensation therefor was argued before me in the case of Menge v. Morris and Essex Railroad Co., 67 Atl. Rep. 1028. The argument and disposition of this motion involved the consideration of practically everything which had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Kane v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Abendroth v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Peck v. Schenectady Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Menge v. Morris & Essex RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. E. RUTHERFORDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. STATE, BY COMM'R OF TRANSPORTATION v. Jan-Mar Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Menge v. Morris & Essex RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API