Boxell v. Bright National Bank
Indiana Supreme Court
' From Delaware Circuit Court; Robert M. Van Atta, Judge. Action by The Bright National- Bank of Flora, Indiana, against Andrew J. Boxell and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)’
1Opinion of the CourtDairy, J.
This was an action brought by appellee to recover on a promissory note, the action having been commenced before the Negotiable Instruments Law of 1913 (Acts 1913 p. 120, §9089a Burns 1914) became effective. The complaint was in one paragraph to which a general denial was filed and also an affirmative answer in six paragraphs, the fourth of which was an answer in non est factum. The trial court sustained a demurrer addressed to the fifth and sixth paragraphs. The issues were closed by a reply in general denial and an affirmative reply addressed to the second and third paragraphs of answer. .…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Schmueckle v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Durham v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Home Insurance v. StrangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Snyder v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
- Gange Lumber Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Crume v. BrightwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.