Durham v. Shannon
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vigo Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Replevin by Shannon to recover the possession of a mare and colt, of which he alleges he is the *404owner, and which it is charged the defendant, Durham, unlawfully took and detained, etc.
Upon an issue made by the general denial, there was a trial resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
It appeared that Patrick Shannon, since deceased, purchased the mare at a public sale in 1877. The plaintiff, although not related by blood, had been in some sense a member of Shannon's family from his early childhood, and claimed that the latter had presented -him the mare, on the day he purchased…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ketcham v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Creighton v. HoppisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wiseman v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Peacock v. AlbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Summerlot v. SummerlotIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hinchcliffe v. KoontzIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lowman v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Bright National Bank v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.