Legal Opinion

State v. Perelli

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1939PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The defendants, Perelli and Venezia, were convicted of killing Armando Salvione. In their appeal they claim that error was committed in the rulings on evidence, in the charge, and in the arguments of the state’s attorneys. It is necessary to summarize the finding in order to understand the rulings.

The state offered evidence and claimed to have proved the following facts: For two years prior to November, 1934, the deceased had lived with his wife Mary in Bridgeport. The defendants had frequently visited at the home of the Salviones and their visits had become much more frequent just prior to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
  2. Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. State v. FarnamOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Neff v. NeffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Schmunk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API